Joint Venture Agreements In Kenya

Depending on the underlying rationale of the joint venture, the expected operating autonomy and the capabilities of the joint venture partners, assets or services of the joint venture may be made available to one or more shareholders. The result is a number of issues to consider. In all economic contexts, provisions for validation and control of base prices and price pricing mechanisms should be important. In the current circumstances, other issues, such as understanding resilience. B and the examination of alternative sources of supply (with flexibility of access to them), where the shareholder in question is not able to be admitted in time, as well as the effect of his incapacity on the shareholder concerned can be highlighted. Would such a failure be, for example, such a fundamental issue for the joint venture that it should cause a cross-break in the framework of the joint venture or the shareholders` pact? In the event of disagreement on issues that require unanimous agreement or the agreement of certain identified shareholders, a related question is what should happen in the event of an impasse. The practical answer may be that things are not implemented without the necessary consent, but some shareholder agreements may also include structural solutions to these situations – for example, when a shareholder is invited or allowed to buy a dissenting shareholder. The feasibility of such structural solutions can be put under pressure in the current circumstances where shareholders are under financial pressure. An inequality in the financial capacity of shareholders there may represent the risk that a shareholder will manipulate such provisions by creating an artificial impasse. Most joint venture agreements will identify a number of potential defaults.

In the case of such an event, structural corrective action may be required. This may include the right to repurchase the defaulting shareholder or, in certain circumstances (most often in cases where there are two or a small number of shareholders), to require the defaulting party to buy back its co-shareholders. Joint venture agreements have many different forms, but even minority stakes may require authorization to control mergers. This can be explained by the fact that the minority shareholder will have veto rights over important aspects of the company`s strategy (for example, its budget. B, its business plan, significant investments or the appointment of executives), or because, in some legal systems, the rules have only a low level of influence or strategic participation (for example. B Acquisitions are covered by a significant influence on a business in the UK; a widely interpreted concept). Once the joint venture agreement is signed, an ad hoc entity will be created for the sole purpose of meeting the commitments and intentions of the joint venture agreement. The newly created company should ideally be registered as a limited company under the Kenya Act.

This may be a particular challenge for joint ventures that are trying to obtain UK resident status but have a multinational shareholder base, including non-British directors. With regard to the proposed new companies, the parties must take care of practical management – will the active participation of shareholder representatives be necessary or will there be an existing or selected operational management team? In the case of existing joint ventures, the parties should consider whether it is necessary to change the existing rules to facilitate decision-making, whether temporary or permanent. While the benefits of joint ventures may be evident in terms of improving the strength of banks and market banks, joint ventures also require a high degree of cooperation and cooperation in a competitive environment of business requirements and priorities.

Comments are closed.